FarchaseVerified by the teams
we test.
Manual, exploit-driven penetration testing that finds the bugs your last pentest missed — delivered fast, and priced so you can do it often.
Teams aren't leaving their old pentest vendor because they stopped caring about security.
They're leaving because the reports stopped telling them anything they didn't already know. The complaint is consistent:
Teams switch to Farchase because it fixes exactly these three failures: depth, speed, and price.
Three reasons, backed by real findings
Farchase leads with human, exploit-driven testing — researchers who reason about an application the way an attacker does, not a scanner matching signatures. The difference shows up in the class of bug found. Recent engagements surfaced findings that automated tooling and prior pentests walked straight past.
Every one is invisible to automated tooling and routinely missed by checkbox pentests — the kind of bug a real attacker chains into a breach.
Serious manual testing doesn't need a six-figure price tag. Farchase is priced so regular, real testing is something teams can actually afford — not a once-a-year compliance grudge-purchase. One missed privilege-escalation or SSRF bug costs far more than the entire engagement.
Traditional firms measure engagements in months of waiting. Farchase compresses that — quick to schedule, quick to test, quick to report — so findings land while they still matter, inside your release cycle rather than three releases later.
What puts Farchase on top
| Automated-scan vendors | Traditional big-name firms | Farchase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finds IDOR, privilege escalation & OWASP Top 10 | Rarely | Sometimes | ★ Core strength |
| Manual, exploit-driven testing | ✕ No | Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Turnaround | Fast but shallow | Slow | ✓ Fast & deep |
| Price | Cheap | Expensive | ✓ Affordable |
| Reproducible PoCs | Sometimes | Yes | ✓ Every finding |
| Frequent testing viable | Yes (low value) | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| Clear remediation guidance | ✕ No | Sometimes | ✓ Yes |
"Farchase conducted a detailed and professional security assessment for HackerRank. Their team identified quality security findings with clear impact, reproduction steps, and remediation guidance. The reports were detailed and well structured, and the engagement provided strong value in a cost-effective manner."
"We had a positive experience working with Farchase on penetration testing for AwardWallet. Their team was professional, responsive, and thorough — covering manual security testing, API testing, business logic, and access control. They provided clear findings and practical recommendations that helped us validate and improve our security posture. We'd happily recommend Farchase to any company looking for a reliable security testing partner."
"Overall we got what we wanted — we'll implement the necessary changes based on this. We will probably work with Farchase again in a year or so, so let's keep in touch. A reliable partner we're glad to recommend."
Ready to see what your last pentest missed?
Deep, manual, attacker-grade testing — fast, and priced so you can do it often. That's why Farchase ends up on top.